After a few years of rising interest rates and bond fund losses, the question I hear most often from people approaching retirement is some version of: do bonds even make sense anymore?
It is a fair question. For a long time, bonds were treated as the reliable, boring half of a portfolio. They provided income, they cushioned the blow when stocks fell, and they generally did what they were supposed to do. Then 2022 happened, and a lot of people watched their bond funds lose value at the same time their stock funds were falling. That experience understandably shook some confidence in the asset class.
But dismissing bonds entirely based on that experience would be a mistake. What happened in 2022 was the result of a specific and unusually rapid shift in monetary policy, not a permanent change in how bonds work. And the silver lining of that rate environment is that bonds now offer meaningfully better yields than they did a few years ago. If you are approaching retirement and looking for reliable income, that actually matters.
Here is how I think about bonds in the context of a retirement plan today.
Why Bonds Felt Different in 2022
The core mechanic of bonds is straightforward: when interest rates rise, existing bond prices fall, and when rates fall, prices rise. This is known as interest rate risk, and it is one of the most important things to understand about the asset class.
For most of the 21st century, interest rates were in a long-term decline. That created a tailwind for bond investors: not only were they receiving interest payments, but the value of their existing bonds was rising as rates fell. The 2022 rate environment reversed that dynamic sharply. The Federal Reserve raised rates faster than at almost any point in modern history, and bond prices dropped accordingly.[^1]
The experience was jarring, particularly for retirees and pre-retirees who had come to think of bonds as simply safe. But it is worth separating the performance of bonds during that specific period from the role bonds play in a retirement plan over the long term. Those are two different questions, and conflating them leads to poor decisions.
Higher rates are actually good news for anyone buying bonds today. You are locking in better yields than were available a few years ago, which is a meaningful advantage if you are building an income strategy for retirement.
The Role Bonds Play in a Retirement Plan
When I work through asset organization with clients, I think about bonds primarily in terms of what job they are doing in the portfolio. That framing matters because it changes how you evaluate them.
Bonds serve three main purposes in a retirement context.
Relative volatility. High-quality government and investment-grade corporate bonds can behave differently from equities, but their market values can still fluctuate with interest rates, credit conditions, and inflation. Their role, if any, depends on liquidity needs, time horizon, objectives, and risk tolerance.
Cash-flow characteristics. Bonds may make stated interest payments under their terms, but payment, reinvestment, default, and market-price risks remain. Bond income should not be described as a substitute for a complete income plan or as a guaranteed spending solution.
Sequence-of-returns considerations. The order of investment returns can be relevant when withdrawals occur. A mix of assets may be discussed in light of spending needs, liquidity, taxes, interest-rate risk, and market risk, but no allocation eliminates sale-timing risk or ensures a particular outcome.[^2]
Bond Characteristics to Evaluate
The following are educational characteristics that may be evaluated in a fact-specific planning discussion. They are not allocation recommendations.
Focus on Quality and Duration
Not all bonds carry the same risk profile. High-yield bonds can have different credit and market sensitivities than government or investment-grade corporate bonds. Credit quality, liquidity, taxes, duration, and objectives are among the relevant tradeoffs.
Duration measures sensitivity to interest-rate changes. Shorter and longer maturities involve different yield, reinvestment, and market-price tradeoffs; neither is universally appropriate.[^3]
A bond ladder uses bonds with staggered maturities. It may be discussed as one way to evaluate maturity timing, but it does not remove interest-rate, credit, reinvestment, liquidity, or inflation risk.[^4]
Consider Cash-Flow Tradeoffs
Social Security and pension benefits have their own program or plan terms. Bond coupons, maturities, and market values have separate risks and should not be described as a guaranteed income floor or as a reliable way to meet a spending gap.
For example, a comparison of stated expenses, available income sources, cash balances, and investment assets can help identify questions for further analysis. It does not establish that a particular bond allocation will fund a spending gap or protect basic living expenses.
Keep a Cash Buffer
Cash and cash equivalents may be considered for near-term needs, but the amount depends on spending, available income, taxes, inflation, investment holdings, and personal preferences. A cash reserve does not prevent losses or ensure that longer-term investments recover.[^5]
Cash, bonds, and equities can have different liquidity, income, growth, volatility, and tax characteristics. How, or whether, they are combined depends on a complete fact pattern and ongoing review.
Think About Where You Hold Bonds
Tax treatment can be relevant because bond interest may be treated differently from qualified dividends or capital gains. Account placement depends on current law, account features, income, state taxation, and individual circumstances.
Investment-location choices involve complex tax, investment, and liquidity tradeoffs. Roth, traditional, and taxable accounts have different legal and tax characteristics, and municipal-bond treatment can vary. A qualified tax professional should confirm current rules before a decision is made.[^6]
What to Do With This Information
If you are within ten years of retirement and have not revisited your bond allocation recently, here are a few practical steps worth taking.
First, understand what you actually own. Many people hold a single broad bond fund without knowing its average duration, credit quality, or yield. If your bond allocation is primarily in a long-duration fund, you are carrying more interest rate risk than you may realize.
Second, think about what job your bonds are doing. Are they providing income? Stability? Both? If you cannot answer that question clearly, the allocation may not be intentional enough to serve you well in retirement.
Third, consider whether a bond ladder makes sense for your situation. For clients who want predictable cash flow and lower sensitivity to rate changes, individual bonds with staggered maturities can be a more effective approach than a bond fund.
Finally, look at where your bonds are held and whether that placement is tax-efficient given your overall income picture. This is one of those details that is easy to overlook but can add up meaningfully over time.
The Bottom Line
Bonds are not obsolete in a retirement portfolio. Their role has shifted from a simple income generator to a more deliberate tool for stability, income floor construction, and sequence-of-returns protection. The current rate environment actually makes them more attractive than they have been in years. The key is being intentional about which bonds you hold, how long they mature, where you hold them, and what specific job they are doing in your plan.
References
[^1]: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. "Open Market Operations." 2024. https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/openmarket.htm
[^2]: Kitces, Michael. "Managing Sequence of Return Risk With Bucket Strategies Vs. A Total Return Rebalancing Approach." Nerd's Eye View. 2012. https://www.kitces.com/blog/managing-sequence-of-return-risk-with-bucket-strategies-vs-a-total-return-rebalancing-approach/
[^3]: Vanguard. "Bond duration: What it is and why it matters." 2023. https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/fixed-income/bond-duration
[^4]: FINRA. "Bond Ladders." 2023. https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/bond-ladders
[^5]: Pfau, Wade. "The Case for Holding Cash in Retirement." Retirement Researcher. https://retirementresearcher.com/the-case-for-holding-cash-in-retirement/
[^6]: Internal Revenue Service. "Publication 550: Investment Income and Expenses." 2024. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p550
${ctaFooter("bonds and retirement income planning")}